OpenAIGPT-5.4 nanoVSOpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

This matchup represents a clear tradeoff between peak intelligence and budget efficiency. GPT-5.6 Terra is noticeably superior (holding a 10.6% average lead in benchmarks), but it carries a massive 12.2x price premium. Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if you need top-tier reasoning or code debugging, but for high-volume pipelines, GPT-5.4 nano is the smarter business decision.

Was this recommendation helpful?

Model Specs

GPT-5.4 nano

Website

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)

52.4%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)

82.8%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)12.2x cheaper

$0.46Input: $0.20 | Output: $1.25

Context Window

400k tokens

Model Specs

GPT-5.6 Terra

Website

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+11.0%)

63.4%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+10.1%)

92.9%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)

$5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00

Context WindowLarger

1.05M tokens

Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions about GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra. GPT-5.4 nano has a blended cost of $0.46/1M tokens, which is about 12.2x cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra at $5.63/1M tokens.

GPT-5.6 Terra is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 63.4% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GPT-5.4 nano which scores 52.4%.

Related Matchups

Explore similar comparisons for GPT-5.4 nano and GPT-5.6 Terra.

Browse More Comparisons

Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

Open Model Finder