whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

OpenAIGPT-5.4 miniVSOpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

This matchup represents a clear tradeoff between peak intelligence and budget efficiency. GPT-5.6 Terra is noticeably superior (holding a 7.2% average lead in benchmarks), but it carries a significant 3.3x price premium. Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if you need top-tier reasoning or code debugging, but for high-volume pipelines, GPT-5.4 mini is the smarter business decision.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs

GPT-5.4 mini

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
54.4%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
87.5%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)3.3x cheaper
$1.69Input: $0.75 | Output: $4.50
Context Window
400k tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.6 Terra

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+9.0%)
63.4%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+5.4%)
92.9%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00
Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokens

Frequently Asked Questions about GPT-5.4 mini vs GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra. GPT-5.4 mini has a blended cost of $1.69/1M tokens, which is about 3.3x cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra at $5.63/1M tokens.

GPT-5.6 Terra is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 63.4% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GPT-5.4 mini which scores 54.4%.

Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

Open Model Finder