OpenAIGPT-5 miniVSOpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

This matchup represents a clear tradeoff between peak intelligence and budget efficiency. GPT-5.6 Luna is noticeably superior (holding a 13.9% average lead in benchmarks), but it carries a significant 3.3x price premium. Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if you need top-tier reasoning or code debugging, but for high-volume pipelines, GPT-5 mini is the smarter business decision.

Was this recommendation helpful?

Model Specs

GPT-5 mini

Website

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)

45.7%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)

81.6%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)3.3x cheaper

$0.69Input: $0.25 | Output: $2.00

Context Window

400k tokens

Model Specs

GPT-5.6 Luna

Website

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+17.0%)

62.7%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+10.7%)

92.3%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)

$2.25Input: $1.00 | Output: $6.00

Context WindowLarger

1.05M tokens

Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions about GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5 mini is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna. GPT-5 mini has a blended cost of $0.69/1M tokens, which is about 3.3x cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna at $2.25/1M tokens.

GPT-5.6 Luna is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 62.7% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to GPT-5 mini which scores 45.7%.

Related Matchups

Explore similar comparisons for GPT-5 mini and GPT-5.6 Luna.

Browse More Comparisons

Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

Open Model Finder