GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteVSOpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna
Our Take
Benchmarks & Scores
good at single-file apps, building games & UIs, and scripting new logic
graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Benchmarks & Scores
excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Frequently Asked Questions about Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a blended cost of $0.56/1M tokens, which is about 4.0x cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna at $2.25/1M tokens.
For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 72% on live-code-bench (good at single-file apps, building games & UIs, and scripting new logic), while GPT-5.6 Luna scores 62.7% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases).
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.6 Luna.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.