whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

GoogleGemini 2.5 FlashVSOpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

These models use different coding evaluation benchmarks — with Gemini 2.5 Flash evaluated on swe-bench-verified (good at editing existing code, cross-file updates, and multi-component systems) and GPT-5.6 Terra on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) — but GPT-5.6 Terra holds a clear reasoning advantage (+24.6% on GPQA Diamond). However, Gemini 2.5 Flash is a massive 6.6x cheaper to run. Choose GPT-5.6 Terra for complex logic and reasoning tasks, or Gemini 2.5 Flash to optimize your budget for high-volume pipelines.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-verified)
60.4%

good at editing existing code, cross-file updates, and multi-component systems

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
68.3%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)6.6x cheaper
$0.85Input: $0.30 | Output: $2.50
Context Window
1.05M tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.6 Terra

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
63.4%

excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+24.6%)
92.9%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00
Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokens

Frequently Asked Questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra. Gemini 2.5 Flash has a blended cost of $0.85/1M tokens, which is about 6.6x cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra at $5.63/1M tokens.

For coding tasks, Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 60.4% on swe-bench-verified (good at editing existing code, cross-file updates, and multi-component systems), while GPT-5.6 Terra scores 63.4% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases).

Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

Open Model Finder