AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6VSOpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Terra directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$6.00Input: $3.00 | Output: $15.00Context Window
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
63.4%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+13.0%)
92.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.1x cheaper
$5.63Input: $2.50 | Output: $15.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. GPT-5.6 Terra has a blended cost of $5.63/1M tokens, which is about 1.1x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $6.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Terra.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.